when “”“”educated”“”” people type a whole lot of words that mean basically nothing and u feel stupid for not understanding them at first and then u reread it and realise NO they are literally saying nothing they are just typing meaningless sentences to revel in their own smugness.
Even assuming that theory “literally say[s] nothing” - an assumption that could only ever perhaps be established through a rigorous reading of the text in question (which texts? what is the cannon?), a reading guided by some knowledge of “nothing” (what does “nothing” mean here? Is not founding a text on the abyss, or creating nihilum ex … ? the very mark of true creation? the re-mark of the divine?) - we must consider the possibility that for the “educated” to speak in such a way that they neither produce, adduce nor deduce may itself be a political act that challenges - indeed, solicits (sensu etymologico) - the institution of education.
Nancy Wake, who has died in London just before her 99th birthday, was a New Zealander brought up in Australia. She became a nurse, a journalist who interviewed Adolf Hitler, a wealthy French socialite, a British agent and a French resistance leader. She led 7,000 guerrilla fighters in battles against the Nazis in the northern Auvergne, just before the D-Day landings in 1944. On one occasion, she strangled an SS sentry with her bare hands. On another, she cycled 500 miles to replace lost codes. In June 1944, she led her fighters in an attack on the Gestapo headquarters at Montlucon in central France.
Ms Wake was furious the TV series [later made about her life] suggested she had had a love affair with one of her fellow fighters. She was too busy killing Nazis for amorous entanglements, she said.
Nancy recalled later in life that her parachute had snagged in a tree. The French resistance fighter who freed her said he wished all trees bore “such beautiful fruit.” Nancy retorted: “Don’t give me that French shit.”